News & Insights
$37.5M Verdict
Articles
Recently the firm was involved in a case involving a sexual assault which occurred at a massage establishment. The case went to trial and a jury found that both the massage therapist and the massage establishment were liable and awarded damages of $140,000. In addition the client was instrumental in having the therapist prosecuted to the full extent of the law and causing an investigation that led to the closure of the establishment. We were glad to be a part of our client’s brave and courageous pursuit of this claim and that full justice was achieved.
Read more Read moreThe firm has been involved in defending several clients who were being pursued for collection of a complicated promissory note obligation. Recently the Supreme Court of Texas agreed with several of our arguments in opposition to findings made by both the trial court and the Dallas Court of Appeals and as a result, the case will continue.
Read more Read moreIn 2023, the firm was involved in a federal court trial claiming the City of Houston's regulatory denial of permits which were requested by our client to repair its thriving apartment complex damaged by Hurricane Harvey flooding constituted a “regulatory” taking for which damages were owed. The trial court rejected the claim and found no taking. In 2025, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that there was indeed a regulatory taking and sent the case back down to the trial court for further proceedings to determine the amount of compensation owed to our client. This was a huge win for our client and an important case that will likely be cited nationwide in property rights takings cases
Read more Read moreBusiness owners seek advice on handling customers refusing masks and protective measures during reopening.
Read more Read moreAvoid rushing to reopen your business; understand the legal implications and prepare for potential claims.
Read more Read more